Sunday, May 19, 2019
Discursive
Discursive EssaySean Killoran The death  penalisation, used from 1707 and fully  annuled in 1969, was said to  befool cut crimes by two thirds. It is a controversial topic ever since it was created. It has taken the lives of guilty and  destitute parties. In a recent survey 70% or the public want the death penalty reinstated for heavy crimes. Personally I feel the death penalty should only be used if a murderer has been proved guilty with flawless evidence. Many  pile feel that the death penalty is a cruel and inhumane punishment for any  pronounce.It brings forward the question that would we be any better than the  someone standing in front of the jury ? There is also a major danger that an  impartial person could be  condemnd to death. There would be know way of releasing the person if there was  able evidence from because they would be dead. For example, In 2004, the state of Texas executed Cameron Todd Willingham for starting the fire that killed his children. The Texas Forensic    Science  commitment found that the arson testimony that led to his conviction was based on flawed science.As of today, 138 wrongly convicted people on death row have been exonerated. One of the main reasons I feel people  be against the death penalty is the cost. In Texas over 430 executions have been recorded since 1976, this has cost them $2. 3 million, which is almost  deuce-ace times of which it would cost to imprison a convict. This makes people think why would you pay almost  triple times the amount to kill a person just so the family can have  penalize and justice. There is more than one side to this argument however.The death penalty did reduce crimes by two thirds therefore making the area a safer place. This gives the impression that a ruthless and no holds  exclude attitude would be put towards the offender and possibly make  early(a) people who are  thought of committing think twice. Also there is no chance of re-offending as the type of people who are  involuntary to do    such a crime will effectively be wiped out. A judge could sen cristalce a man to  bearing in prison. That same man could be out of jail with 15  years. How has life in jail become known as ten to fifteen ears? If the judge says life with no parole, then the criminal could stay in jail a bit longer,  besides that would  baseborn the country would have to take care of the prisoner for twenty to twenty five years. How can we  reliance the murderers and thieves of our country to a law that will either let them out in ten years or have us take care of them for twenty years, and then let them go? The criminals do not fear the punishment anymore, because they know they will not die. Punishment is meant to be feared by the convict and to keep him from doing it again.I am not saying we execute all of the criminals in the world,  nevertheless it has to remain an  plectrum for the courts to use and to scare the criminals of the country. Many criminals dont fear the law. They know that they wi   ll get out in ten years if they murder someone. They are not afraid of jail or their punishment. How can we force them to  breaker point killing or stealing if they are not afraid of the punishment we give them. Most  intellectual men are afraid of death. They dont want to die. There are also men that dont fear death, but enjoy killing.They must be controlled, but if they are sentenced to life, they are soon free to kill again. Again, I am not saying we should kill all the men in jail and any other criminal in the world. That is not the answer either, but we must have the death penalty as an option so that they will be afraid to break the law, and to control those who dont fear death but love to break the law. The Death Penalty has proven to have good benefits upon the country in  find the consequences that criminals deserve. This is needed to ensure the safety of society.If this is the case, there is no need for us to consider the expenses involved in the death penalty. Certainly h   uman lives are more important, for it may easily be yours. We should not abolish the death penalty, but hold our country accountable for properly using the death penalty upon those who deserve it. Sources YYwww. wikipedia. com-0 YYwww. answers. yahoo. com-1 YYwww. tnjn. com-2 Word Count 766 -0  http//www. wikipedia. com/ -1  http//www. answers. yahoo. com/ -2  http//www. tnjn. com/  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.